Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

10-08-2007, 11:32 AM #11

12thMan

MVP

Join Date: May 2005

Location: washington, D.C.

Posts: 11,460

Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?

Like I said, I have no problem with the two back system. It's working fine. I'd just like to see Portis get about 5 to 10 more touches. Maybe not every game, just more often.

12thMan

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by 12thMan

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 3.60122 seconds with 11 queries

10-08-2007, 11:32 AM	#11
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis? Like I said, I have no problem with the two back system. It's working fine. I'd just like to see Portis get about 5 to 10 more touches. Maybe not every game, just more often.