Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Can someone tell me what happened?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2004, 12:26 PM   #16
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 3,813
I think I heard on espn that sapp was pissed that most of the weeks planning for the defense was geared toward containing san diego's te Antonio Gates(a huge fantasy sleeper before this year) and finally after San Diego scored its 6TH TD and Gates second of the day, Sapp acted in his typically childish way.
I know this is wayyyyyyyy early but with how well Bree has matured this year and ramsey looking like a ruined player thanks to spurrier, think the skins might dump ramsey or brunnel(even though it'd be a big cap hit) and go after Brees who's gonna be a free agent after this season? and to think we could have gotten him and san diego's 1st and 2nd round picks from this past year for ramsey and our first round spot. We would have traded down, still gotten Taylor as well as have 2-3 more 1st day picks and a mobile qb whose currently ranked 3rd in qb rating in the entire nfl. Or maybe I'm just thinking this stuff up cuz I'm bored right now, lol.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-02-2004, 12:42 PM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,570
Speaking of Gates the guy is a monster. He was a fantasy sleeper in Fantasy Football Index but silly me thought who's gonna throw him the ball? The guy is quickly becoming one of the best in the league.

As far as Brees I don't see it happening. I think we'll stick with what we've got and Ramsey will win the job once he settles into this offense. Another offseason of camps will do him alot of good, and before this season is through I think he'll have a few starts, maybe 4-5.
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 12:42 PM   #18
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
if, if, if, if, if...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 12:52 PM   #19
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Christ I tired of hearing about the damn QBs. THEY AREN'T THAT BAD!!!! Seriously...name some of the QBS who've won superbowls. Brad Johnson? Trent Dilfer? Please don't tell me either of these guys is any better than either Brunell or Ramsey. The problem is not simply that our QBs suck. The problem is that we have a million tiny problems. The tiny problems that every team has. We just have more than anyone else. This has been our problem for a decade.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 12:59 PM   #20
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG
Christ I tired of hearing about the damn QBs. THEY AREN'T THAT BAD!!!! Seriously...name some of the QBS who've won superbowls. Brad Johnson? Trent Dilfer? Please don't tell me either of these guys is any better than either Brunell or Ramsey. The problem is not simply that our QBs suck. The problem is that we have a million tiny problems. The tiny problems that every team has. We just have more than anyone else. This has been our problem for a decade.
I agree, we're not 2-5 simply because of the QB play. It's definitely contributed to it, but it's not the only reason.

But as we all know, QB's receive too much credit when the team is doing well and too much blame when the team struggles. They're the convenient hero/scapegoat.
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 01:29 PM   #21
REDSKIN2
Camp Scrub
 
REDSKIN2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
Well put Matty, I couldn't state it any better myself. I agree 100%. Norv is not a good head coach. Yes, the Raiders do have personnell issues. But a whole lot of coaches have had a lot less talent than Turner with better results. That was my main issue with him here. Everybody makes too many excuses for Norv and they blame Snyder. People forget, Turner is now a loser with three different owners: Jack Kent Cooke, John Kent Cooke, Dan Snyder and Al Davis.

Stick to the booth Norv. This has been your entire Head Coaching Career
REDSKIN2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 02:22 PM   #22
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
I agree, we're not 2-5 simply because of the QB play. It's definitely contributed to it, but it's not the only reason.

But as we all know, QB's receive too much credit when the team is doing well and too much blame when the team struggles. They're the convenient hero/scapegoat.

That's why they earn the big bucks. If Brunell was 10% more accurate we'd have won more than 50% of our games.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2004, 03:46 PM   #23
jrocx69
Special Teams
 
jrocx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
it is about qb play, the most important position on the field and its our worst position and dead last in the nfl or atleast nfc. imagine the possibilities of a 80 yard TD pass to coles on a fly pattern. it could happen if brunell would throw it to coles and not off target out of bounds or to the other team. against the bears, all day to pass and coles was open deep and what happned, a freaking shit pass that sailed away and was not even on target. or this past game, DID YOU MISS THE 3 YARD DUMP SCREEN PASS TO TAYLOR????? IT WAS OVER THROWN TO WHERE HE HAD TO MAKE A JUMPING ONE HANDED GRAB WHICH CAUSED A 2 YARD LOSS ON A 3RD N 1. or maybe clinton out in the flat that could have made a decent 9 to 15 yards and he throws it where clinton has to dive and we get 5 yards. or later on the same route, its so terribly thrown that clinton couldnt even catch it. IT ALL STARTS THERE. OH, last one, cooley open in the endzone, and brunell spins a 360 and over thows him for a TD. granted he was under some preasure, but alot of qbs make that throw because they can throw it on a rope instead we have a guy who throws hot air baloons and it sails over our 6'4" h-back in the endzone with NOBODY ON D IN SITE. once again, it all starts there.
jrocx69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 08:51 PM   #24
flyfischer
Camp Scrub
 
flyfischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 47
Brunell hasn't been playing well, but you can't forget the bad play calling, the penalties on the line, and the pressure he's taking. As I say to my dad during games "typical Redskins football." Basically, when you've sucked for so long, its hard to just automatically be good. Give Joe time, we'll get it together, I think people's expectations were too high this season.
flyfischer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2004, 11:47 PM   #25
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
i agree. expectations were way to high. the last few years i've thought we were a very talented team that just needed the right direction, but I'm not so sure now. Hopefully a full year together can improve the chemistry of Gibbs' real redskins, cos I can't take many more losing seasons.
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25828 seconds with 12 queries