Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mark Brunell game

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2004, 09:28 PM   #16
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyT
nothing more and nothing less. The one offensive TD was due to Portis and the other TD was from the "D". Brunell was relegated to handing off the ball and getting the h*** out of the way.

We won this game for 3 reasons, none of which had anything to do with Brunell:

1. Our outstanding "D".

2. We played a team with an offense as inept as ours.

3. We had a lead and didn't have to rely on the non-existent passing game to get us back into it.

But, I no longer blame Brunell for what's happening. No, the blame rests squarely on Gibbs' shoulders. He is just too stubborn to admit that his pursuit and signing of Brunell was a colossal and costly mistake.

I am tired of hearing Gibbs make apologies for the abysmal play of Brunell.

Let's jump ahead a bit. I think Brunell will continue to play unless he's injured. Let's assume he finishes the season and we end up, say, 6-10 which is highly likely. Let's say Ramsey, in total frustration, demands to be traded. Where does that leave us offensively? In nowheresville, that's where.

Thanks, Joe, for an offense that can't seem to score more than 10-15 points a game. Thanks for sticking by a QB that can't get the job done. Thanks for being too stubborn to admit that you (yes it is mostly Gibbs' fault) committed the team to a QB that is no longer effective, to the tune of $43 million.
You have to still ask yourself the question, what would Ramsey look like with our O line that stills seems to let defensive players slip through the cracks? I'll tell you, a lot of sacks and possibly more turnovers. Brunell hasn't don e anything to help us accept not turn the ball over. It's sad, but it's true.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-07-2004, 09:47 PM   #17
LadyT
Special Teams
 
LadyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 219
Sunra,

I have to disagree. Even when he's had good protection and had time to throw, Brunell has been totally ineffective.

It's way, way past time to make a change. But, it seems that Gibbs is digging in his heels and we all will be the worse for his stubborness.
LadyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 11:43 PM   #18
CROOKEDSKINS
Camp Scrub
 
CROOKEDSKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KEY WEST FL
Age: 52
Posts: 93
has anyone heard what gibbs said after the game about mark
i live in fl and had to goto work right after the game or was it just the same bs about how he played his guts out
CROOKEDSKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 12:22 AM   #19
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by CROOKEDSKINS
has anyone heard what gibbs said after the game about mark
i live in fl and had to goto work right after the game or was it just the same bs about how he played his guts out
He had nothing to say about Mark. He adressed the passing game as Inconsistant and thats it. He focused on the positives for the most part. I'm pretty sure hes starting to come around.
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 04:46 PM   #20
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
A total ONE pass by Brunell in the second half pretty much sums up how much confidence Gibbs now has in Brunell...or in the passing game.
To his defense, there were a quite a few drops this week, but it was usually because the throws weren't as accurate as they should have been.

Yeah, it's not all Brunell, but something HAS to be done...and putting Ramsey is worth a shot. If he's no better, then he can just be the one to hand the ball to Portis all day.
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 04:48 PM   #21
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
can u imagine if we made the right choice in a vet qb and got jeff garcia. I think we may serious contenders

why did we give this guy so much money
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 04:54 PM   #22
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Garcia is too turnover prone for Gibbs' taste.

I like him though, he's a gutsy QB and he can move around the pocket.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 06:38 PM   #23
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
garcia was the best option this offseason... he probably is too int prone for gibbs, but i think he's good... seriously, ramsey is perfectly capable of throwing 5 for 15 and handing it off 40 times a game... might as well start his training now...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30064 seconds with 12 queries