Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


On Blache

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2008, 12:36 AM   #31
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail to the Redskins View Post
Whoa, Whoa, Whoa...

1) Check the time of possession over the passed 6 games...

2) I'll guarantee you that the Bungles are averaging 25.6 points allowed. They scored 20 against us. I'll guarantee you that 10 of their 13 other opponents have scored 20 or more vs them this year.

3) Below average pass defense?? HUH?? Opponents completing 55% of their passes (3rd in NFL), a 75.1 QB rating against us (7th), 6.35 yards per attempt (5th), only 188 ypg against (6th)... all of this is BELOW average??

4) Talk about "not knowing how to use statistics" to make an argument....
Roethlisberger - 29.4 completion % / 15.1 QB rating vs Skins - 59.4% comp / 80.2 QBR overall
Flacco - 47% comp / 64.4 QBR vs Skins - 58.7% comp / 76.9 QBR overall
Hasselbeck - 50% comp /54.7 QBR vs Skins - 52% comp / 57.8 QBR overall
Bulger - 136 yds passing vs Skins
Anderson - 37.8% comp / 57.9 QBR vs Skins - 50.2% comp /66.5 QBR overall

and for the big ones....

Brees - season low 216yds, 69.6 QB Rating vs Skins - 93.9 QBR overall
and
Warner - season low 192 yds, 53.3% comp, 81.5 QBR vs Skins - 68.4%/97.5 QBR overall

So how does every team pass the ball WORSE against other teams??




Seriously... do not talk about someone not knowing how to read statistics... enough with the attacks, if you disagree, fine, but people don't go attacking others when you make no sense at all yourself...
Way to omit Leftwich, Fitzpatrick, Orlovsky, and Bulger because they don't support your argument. Better yet, thanks for checking to see that your argument is bunk, and then trying to throw out selective stats anyway, and hoping I wouldn't notice.

I thought we defended Warner and Brees pretty darn well three months ago. Our offense also averaged 26.5 points between those games, and at the time, was clearly helping to contribute to our team success.

Thanks though, I needed a good chuckle. Carry on.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 12-16-2008, 12:48 AM   #32
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail to the Redskins View Post
As I said in another thread...

Our Defense (and definitely Blache) is NOT TO BLAME!!

The ONLY stat that matters is POINTS ALLOWED... or am I wrong??



OVER THE LINE!
djnemo65 is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 10:18 AM   #33
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: On Blache

The D is just not the problem with this team at this point. Yes, we have let a few teams run out the clock in the 4th but if our O had scored 24 points it would not have mattered. We have leaned on the D way to long while our O has done nothing to help them along.
firstdown is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:12 AM   #34
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,378
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Way to omit Leftwich, Fitzpatrick, Orlovsky, and Bulger because they don't support your argument. Better yet, thanks for checking to see that your argument is bunk, and then trying to throw out selective stats anyway, and hoping I wouldn't notice.

I thought we defended Warner and Brees pretty darn well three months ago. Our offense also averaged 26.5 points between those games, and at the time, was clearly helping to contribute to our team success.

Thanks though, I needed a good chuckle. Carry on.
Every single expert that has followed the Redskins has basically said that the defense has done it's job. That Blache and his coaches are doing a nice job considering what they have to work with. These are people that played in the NFL and know more about football than you do. Yet you seem to try and over analyze everything...from some quote Blache said to talking about schemes that you probably know nothing about. Amazing.

Last edited by skinsfan69; 12-16-2008 at 01:46 PM.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:40 AM   #35
Joe Kidd
Camp Scrub
 
Joe Kidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 42
Re: On Blache

I do think there's been a dropoff from Williams to Blache. His schemes are much more vanilla and pretty boring frankly, and overall I think Williams is a more knowledgeable and skillful coordinator.
Joe Kidd is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 11:46 AM   #36
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: On Blache

Blache is not in the top 20 of problems on this team. The Redskins unwillingness to sink draft picks and money into rebuilding thier lines is not the Defensive Coordinators fault. he works with the talent he is given and he's done a damn good job with what he has if you ask me.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 12:24 PM   #37
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,177
Re: On Blache

Exactly. The redskins have more issues in the FO than with Blache. He's laying with guys who are underachievers and past their prime on the d- line. Thats not Blache's fault.
vallin21 is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 12:31 PM   #38
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: On Blache

This should not be an "either/or" discussion. It should be a "both/and" discussion. Or maybe a "neither/nor" discussion.

Greg Blache is not a great defensive coordinator. When he left Chicago, no one their held a "Pity Party" for the team or the fans or the rest of the coaching staff.

Here in Washington, Blache has no great players on the defense; he has three or four who are well above average and the rest are very ordinary on most Sundays.

Put those two things together and look at the 7-7 record and you have to say that Blache is doing fine with what he has. Neither Blache nor this assemblage of defensive talent is taking the Redskins - or any NFL team deep in the playoffs.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 12:32 PM   #39
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,368
Re: On Blache

The defense needs some work, but the offensive side of the ball has the biggest issues. A lot of the woes of the defense could be fixed by our offense being more effective.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 12:36 PM   #40
Joe Kidd
Camp Scrub
 
Joe Kidd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 42
Re: On Blache

The D has been solid this year but at times they are prone to getting gashed at the worst times. When we need a stop late in a game they just can't seem to get it. Not saying that's all coaching but it's a part of it. I think there's more talent on the D then some people are giving them credit for.
Joe Kidd is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 12:55 PM   #41
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Kidd View Post
The D has been solid this year but at times they are prone to getting gashed at the worst times. When we need a stop late in a game they just can't seem to get it. Not saying that's all coaching but it's a part of it. I think there's more talent on the D then some people are giving them credit for.
There is talent but it's mostly on the back end and to be a dominant D it needs to be up front.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 01:15 PM   #42
MrJL
Special Teams
 
MrJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 116
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Exactly. The redskins have more issues in the FO than with Blache. He's laying with guys who are underachievers and past their prime on the d- line. Thats not Blache's fault.

By my count we've had 57 picks since 2000.

30 for offense
25 for Defense
2 for Special Teams

7 QB
7 WR(despite the claim by the Post recently we've been drafting a lot, we've picked the same number of QB's)
4 TE
4 RB
8 OL

6 DL
7 LB
12 DB

More than any position on the O. It even tops WR and TE put together if you want to, since I counted CB and S together.

I think this strongly points to DL not being a priority. But the defensive backfield is about as good as it's going to get.

I actually think there's a good chance we will go for the line this season, even if it's by process of elimination, unless we trade the pick. Draft a reciever and we have to give up on someone we probably don't want to. RB's one of out most talented positions. We don't need another first round QB. The secondary is loaded. The only position that can make a claim for help as much as the lines might be linebacker.
MrJL is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 01:34 PM   #43
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: On Blache

To be honest...the shiznit has been the 3-4 for several years now. I have wondered why we have not changed to that but obviously when Williams was here he like the 4-3 with his added twist. All of his pressure came from CB or Safeties and occassional LB blitzes. The whole up front scheme is based off of stopping the run unfortunatly out of 4 players 2 were run stuffers. The others were better at pass. In Blache it was for the most part similar. I however believe his scheme is based off of LB blitzes. We have not seen a whole lot of Safety or CB blitzes and when we try it they get picked up or caught up at the line.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 02:50 PM   #44
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrJL View Post
Thing is, I don't think you need to assign a lot of blame to Blache to feel it's time for a change.

With the offense struggling we need to switch from a D philosophy where they keep the O in the game, to where they try to win the game.
How can the D keep the O in the game if the O cannot put points on the board or convert third downs?
firstdown is offline  
Old 12-16-2008, 03:12 PM   #45
MrJL
Special Teams
 
MrJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 116
Re: On Blache

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
How can the D keep the O in the game if the O cannot put points on the board or convert third downs?
Personally, I've thought the O's come together a couple of times late in the game. Such as the fourth down TD against the Ravens and the 80-some yard drive that didn't get anything against the Bengals but still got them to the half yard line. That suggests something was coming together on the O. Then the D gives up another score and the O has to abandon what finally started working because a one score game is now a two score game.
MrJL is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.81425 seconds with 12 queries