Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


O-line The Real Problem

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-20-2004, 08:06 AM   #19
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
Smootsmack: The second we have that line, that back, and sub-zero temperatures in snow I'll totally agree with running it that much.

We're 17th in rushing with 1564 yards. Ahead of philly, buffalo, carolina, tampa. And Offiss, I'm not saying the line is not a problem, because it is. However, the only thing that can make that line better is continuity. Heston was an absolutely horrible O line coach, I saw an interview with Samuels that said he tryed to change the blocking technique he's always used. I feel that running up the middle three times in any situation is often a very poor series of calls. Because it always seems to send our offense right back to the bench! Mix it up a little bit! I totally agree that a running game is VERY important, but if we're in a tight game and can't punch it in, then we have some real problems.

Honestly, most of the time on 4th and goal within the 5 I'd just go for it. With our defense we'll keep field position. OKay, not most of the time, but depending on the situation it's worth a try. I think we just need to mix up how we deal with the red zone a little bit.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.99032 seconds with 11 queries