Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes 193 91.47%
No 18 8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2012, 03:45 AM   #301
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
yes I bought a bottle of J Walker Gold earlier and sipped it liberally. But seriously, if a dude doesn't have an attractive girlfriend/wife I tend to think he lacks confidence. I say this from experience on both sides of the coin. If a rich, famous, star athlete doesn't have a bombshell girlfriend there's something amiss IMO.

Hopefully Griffin is single or dating Miss America by regular season lol...
And everyone said you can't go wrong with RGIII, he always makes the right decisions or choices.
SBXVII is offline  

Advertisements
Old 03-10-2012, 03:50 AM   #302
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

On a side note,

I'm not sure if someone tweeted to Oldenburg or if he put it out there but the tweet said "David Stern to veto Redskins/Rams trade, keep following story developing."

Not sure if they were just being stupid or if there is something to it and not sure if the trade can be stopped. Does the League have to agree with the trade or can teams trade without League approval?
SBXVII is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 03:52 AM   #303
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,368
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
On a side note,

I'm not sure if someone tweeted to Oldenburg or if he put it out there but the tweet said "David Stern to veto Redskins/Rams trade, keep following story developing."

Not sure if they were just being stupid or if there is something to it and not sure if the trade can be stopped. Does the League have to agree with the trade or can teams trade without League approval?
I think Jason Whitlock was the first one to tweet this and it was more a pun at Stern who vetoed the Chris Paul to the Lakers trade.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:01 AM   #304
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,726
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Andrew luck falls 2nd to redskins ... *plot thickens *
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:03 AM   #305
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,726
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
3 high draft picks for one guy? What an overpay! When do we ever get on the right side of trades? Never. I like RG3 a lot but not at this price. This team simply isn't in a position to throw away high draft picks.
This.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:06 AM   #306
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,726
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

We will sign manning and Wayne and moved up to get blackmon 2nd overall :-( lmao this trade semi annoys me
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:08 AM   #307
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 41
Posts: 20,391
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

It is 1:05 in the morning pst! I am going to read every single post before I go to bed, I am so jacked up right now! HAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!

If you think the price was too much, you could be right, but lets enjoy it, we have a franchise QB. Does it feel good? Fluffing right it does. Have I mentioned HAILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?
sdskinsfan2001 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:17 AM   #308
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:27 AM   #309
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Wow, I absolutely love Griff.
I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though.

HTTR!
30gut is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:28 AM   #310
SkinItup
Special Teams
 
SkinItup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 155
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan View Post
This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve.
Negative Nelly. I have wanted RG3 since September but I think the price is too high. With that said RG3 is not a pro ready qb and perhaps that with the new rookie wage scale this trade makes sense. While we turn him into a pro qb, we surround him with some mid level talent and by the time he is an all-pro we will be able to draft good toys for him.

We need to a build a team. An athletic qb with accuracy, a run game, and a turnover based D sounds like it a good foundations in today's league. Only time will tell if we gave up too much.
SkinItup is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:30 AM   #311
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

This is a great trade. Although I'm still not totally convinced that Irsay takes Luck. Either way we have a franchise QB. I know a 1st for 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st seems like a lot. But it's really not if we consistently play .500 ball. Sure we need other areas. All teams do. Even the Pats or Packers. I'm excited to see Luck or more probably RG3 in Burgundy and Gold! Go Redskins! Thanks for making my offseason always exciting!!!
__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:36 AM   #312
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
^ Don't forget Bryce Harper Dirt.
John Wall are you serious. Yea he has really improved the sorry ass Wizards. I will give them some credit for beating the Fakers the other night.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:39 AM   #313
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by iRepDMV View Post
Robert Griffin would look awfully nice in a #6 jersey! HTTR!!
He wore number #10 at Baylor so i expect him to wear it for the Redskins.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:41 AM   #314
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,800
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Wow, I absolutely love Griff.
I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though.

HTTR!
2014 First round really burns me. I could careless about the second this year and next years first...but that additional 1st? ugh

But im with you 100% 30, I gonna stick my head in the sand and at 430 in the morning, start drinking again...HTTR!
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 04:42 AM   #315
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,174
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
He wore number #10 at Baylor so i expect him to wear it for the Redskins.


Jabar Gaffney?
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44030 seconds with 13 queries