Should Mike Shanahan be fired?

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Word. The Packers recently had a SB winning season with a record number of starters and regular rotation guys on IR etc.

I don't understand how people try to make the injury excuse, unless it's your franchise QB. The Packers SB season was discussed far and wide precisely because they had sooooo many injured players.

Big difference is those teams had an established base of starters and depth, not a Frankenroster that we've got. We have players from Gibbs, Zorn and Shanahan eras with influence from Snyder, Cerrato and Bruce Allen.

[Swarley]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Word. The Packers recently had a SB winning season with a record number of starters and regular rotation guys on IR etc.

I don't understand how people try to make the injury excuse, unless it's your franchise QB. The Packers SB season was discussed far and wide precisely because they had sooooo many injured players.

People go on and one about the Packers like that's something to expect from every injured team. What the Packers did in their SB season was pretty amazing and it'll probably not happen for some time. That's like saying that the Ravens won with Trent Dilfer, therefore every other team is grossly overstating the need for a big time QB.


The Packers SB winning team, like the Ravens with Dilfer are the exception, not the rule.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

Welcome Alvin! Hang your coat by the door. GTripp brought the chips and dip (it rhymed, sorry), punch it in has brought the punch, Goat has the lamb chops and I brought the haterade, if punch isn't your thing. Slingin Sammy is slingin' the dubsacks in the corner over there............

Make yourself at home.

Lmao.
Misery does love company.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Swarley

People go on and one about the Packers like that's something to expect from every injured team. What the Packers did in their SB season was pretty amazing and it'll probably not happen for some time. That's like saying that the Ravens won with Trent Dilfer, therefore every other team is grossly overstating the need for a big time QB.


The Packers SB winning team, like the Ravens with Dilfer are the exception, not the rule.

Good point.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Swarley

People go on and one about the Packers like that's something to expect from every injured team. What the Packers did in their SB season was pretty amazing and it'll probably not happen for some time. That's like saying that the Ravens won with Trent Dilfer, therefore every other team is grossly overstating the need for a big time QB.


The Packers SB winning team, like the Ravens with Dilfer are the exception, not the rule.

Dont forget about the Giants last year. Read the article i posted. Its all there in black n white. And AGAIN nobody is expecting a damn superbowl but how about a team that can at least be competitive against a 1-6 team! The score yesterday is not even close to what happened on the field. OUR FIELD!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Dont forget about the Giants last year. Read the article i posted. Its all there in black n white. And AGAIN nobody is expecting a damn superbowl but how about a team that can at least be competitive against a 1-6 team! The score yesterday is not even close to what happened on the field. OUR FIELD!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 times out of 100 years isn't bad.. Don't know why the Redskins are not doing it now with those odds.

I wonder how many of those injury riddled teams had a rookie QB/RB and -50 billion in cap space.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Dont forget about the Giants last year. Read the article i posted. Its all there in black n white. And AGAIN nobody is expecting a damn superbowl but how about a team that can at least be competitive against a 1-6 team! The score yesterday is not even close to what happened on the field. OUR FIELD!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Giants were mostly healthy by the time the playoffs rolled around.

The article you posted is from 9/10/11.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Give him this season and next season, and if we don't win at least 7 games next year or are the best 6-10 team of all times then you think about getting another coach (think, not necessarily pull the trigger). We got RGIII and Alfmo, need to get Garcon and Davis back healthy (Really hope we resign davis). And most importantly fix the secondary and Orakpo's chest muscles! No one in our secondary that has started a game for us should be starting next year.

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Dont forget about the Giants last year. Read the article i posted. Its all there in black n white. And AGAIN nobody is expecting a damn superbowl but how about a team that can at least be competitive against a 1-6 team! The score yesterday is not even close to what happened on the field. OUR FIELD!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can you do me a favor? Your post are all ready annoying in a attempt to make them less annoying can you please remove the Tapatalk signature.

Thanks in advance.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

Welcome Alvin! Hang your coat by the door. GTripp brought the chips and dip (it rhymed, sorry), punch it in has brought the punch, Goat has the lamb chops and I brought the haterade, if punch isn't your thing. Slingin Sammy is slingin' the dubsacks in the corner over there............

Make yourself at home.

haha shit add me too

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

The Giants were mostly healthy by the time the playoffs rolled around.

The article you posted is from 9/10/11.

I know it was but you will see they lost three defensive starters(at least) for the year. Also i pointed out the fact that they were mostly healthy for the run in the playoffs in another post. They still had to make it to that point and fight through the injuries to get to that point. We are a far cry from "getting" to that point. Our injuries are less than theirs were and we have crumbled. No way we will be 7-7 - and in the nfc rite now that would have us in contention for the second wildcard probably.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I know it was but you will see they lost three defensive starters(at least) for the year. Also i pointed out the fact that they were mostly healthy for the run in the playoffs in another post. They still had to make it to that point and fight through the injuries to get to that point. We are a far cry from "getting" to that point. Our injuries are less than theirs were and we have crumbled. No way we will be 7-7 - and in the nfc rite now that would have us in contention for the second wildcard probably.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dude lose it.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Can you do me a favor? Your post are all ready annoying in a attempt to make them less annoying can you please remove the Tapatalk signature.

Thanks in advance.

No but thanks for asking. Add me to your ignore list. This is bought to you in advance by my i phone using tap a talk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by punch it in

No but thanks for asking. Add me to your ignore list. This is bought to you in advance by my i phone using tap a talk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dude seriously it is annoying. No one else has it, just take it off. I have been here 7 years I don't have anybody on my ignore list. You have been here all of a few months loss the signature. You probably don't even know how to do it.

[punch it in]

Maybe if you had asked nicely instead of calling me annoying. I dont refer to you as cranky, or rude do I?
Oh and I do know how to do it. How is the new sig?


Mredskins doesnt like the following sig- Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk