|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin
Are you sure? W/out looking it up, it seems to me many a player has been franchised with the intent of getting a trade. How would you prove that the "intent to trade" (barring something idiotic like the GM saying "Oh, we don't want him, we just tagged him to trade him")?
|
Flynn departure may not aid Packers - JSOnline
Quote:
So once the Packers tag Flynn, that $14 million counts against their salary cap. Flynn would automatically become the highest-paid player on the team in terms of annual salary.
NFL teams are prohibited from trading franchise players. In fact, the rules say you may not franchise a player with the intent to sign him to a contract and then trade him. However, this rule has been broken before and the NFL tends to look the other way.
|
This is where I got this from. Like you said, how could you really prove that?
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
Last edited by NC_Skins; 02-23-2012 at 02:46 PM.
|
02-23-2012, 02:42 PM
Threaded Mode